From CIOFS-L, Year 10, N. 30, 2004, Weekly edition (CIOFS Bulletin, 2004, N. 5)
 

THE SFO IN THE CHURCH

Man and Woman: Diversity and Mutual Complementarity

           by Emanuela De Nunzio
(former SFO Minister General)



As announced in the last issue of this Bulletin,  on January 30-31, 2004, the Seminar of study on this topic, organized by the Council for the Laity, took place. With its Prefect, Mons. Stanislaw Rylko, the new Secretary, Mons. Joseph Clemens, the Undersecretary, Avv. Guzman Carriquiry, and some of their employees, a group of about forty guests (three quarters of which were women!)  were present, coming  from all over the world.

The work of the two days was very deep and engaging with a good number of talks and debates. The talks were of high level, given by qualified and expert people (theologians, philosophers, psychologists, historians, sociologists, journalists). The debates, in which nearly all present took part, were lively and engaging.

The talks were mostly based on the teachings of John Paul II in his anthropological and theological foundations of the dignity and mission of women. His reflections on women, in fact, are expressed in at least two of the most important papal documents: Mulieris dignitatem (1988) and Letter to  women (1995, proclaimed by the United Nations the International Year of the woman), subsequently taken up again by the Pope himself, with analytical thoroughness, in catecheses, allocutions, messages, homilies, etc.

In  Mulieris dignitatem, the Pope begins with a series of considerations on the two biblical stories of the creation and asserts: "Man cannot exist alone (cfr. Gn 2,18); he can only exist as a unity of the two, and therefore in relation to another human person..."   Man-woman thus appears as the expression of the fundamental principle of dual unity, according to which, in the contingent reality, unity is always introduced as internal polarity (and this is true also for spirit and body, individual and community).

Such contingency does not characterize only the limit of us humans ("it's not good for man to be alone"), but also our ability to outdo oneself in the discovery of the other as positive self. In this sense, the contingency reveals that humans, like every creature, is a sign: not only individual (identity) but also person (relation, difference). To this purpose the Pope says: "Being a person in the image and likeness of God thus also involves existing in a relationship, in relation to the other 'I'".  The male and female relationship is characterized, at the same time, as a relationship of identity and of diversity.

The issue of identity is easily reconciled to the absolute parity of the two (of man and woman) in being person and in all that derives from this. The conciliar text that the Pope stresses continuously in order to illustrate this affirmation, is taken from the Council Document Gaudium et spes (n.24): "Man, who is the only creature on earth which God willed for itself, cannot fully find himself except through a sincere gift of himself".

The issue of diversity is more complex and problematic. In any case it cannot be reduced to a simple problem of roles, but it calls for being understood in its essence, to prescind from its manifestations. Seen in these terms, dual unity (of man and woman) is transported to the essential dimension of the human being as imago Dei (image of God) and can be seen also in a certain analogy with the infra-Trinitarian relation and with the hypostatic union of the divine and human natures in the person of Christ. The mysteries of the Trinity and of the incarnation are therefore the foundation of the dual unity and, in the end, of human sexuality. To speak of the Trinitarian union and of the hypostatic unity as foundations of the dual unity of man-woman demonstrates that this difference, without confusion and separation, is a positive fact that exalts and does not break unity. This helps us also to understand that unity can only be realized in its fullness by and through this difference.

Finally, dual unity has its ultimate model in the marriage between the Lord, crucified and resurrected, and his body, that is, the Church. Such espousal dimension of the relationship God-man in the Church is expressed in the Pauline image of the Church, spouse of Christ. The Lord, in fact, loves his people as a spouse and offers his life for her salvation. And the Church, spouse of Christ, receives from him all her fecundity. In the same way, every kind of love (parent-child, siblings, friends, etc.)  finds its term of comparison in the spousal love of Christ: "Love as I have loved you". To this purpose the Pope asserts: "The nature of the one and the other love (virginity and marriage) is spousal, that is, it is passed through the total gift of oneself.  Both loves tend to express the spousal significance of the body, which "from the beginning" is inscribed in the personal structure of the man and of the woman themselves."

From these premises, difficult but necessary, the Seminar has developed a series of inferences and of applications on the family level, as well as the social and ecclesial, that I will try to transmit to you through the Bulletin, when the proceedings of the meeting are published.

But I would like to point out to you, how useful for a positive placement of women in the life of the Church, was that pronouncement of the Holy Father in 1995 (Angelus of the 3rd of September), when he made "an appeal to the whole ecclesial community  to favor in all ways, in its inner life, feminine participation," pointing out some of the "ample spaces" which are open to the presence of  women: "for example -- he affirms -- theological education; accepted forms of liturgical ministry, including altar service; pastoral and administrative Councils; diocesan Synods and ecclesiastical Tribunals; many pastoral activities, and new ways of participation in the care of  parishes, in case of clergy shortages, except for the specific priestly tasks."

I hope that the readers will pardon me if now I pass from a general level, like the one outlined  here, to a more limited and specific one, which is the Franciscan Family. It seems to me that dual unity is found also in the mutual vital communion between "all members of the people of God -- laity, religious, and priests -- who recognize that they are called to follow Christ in the footsteps of St. Francis of Assisi": dual unity between male members of the First Order and TOR, and the corresponding mainly feminine members, of the Second and Third Orders.

From the papal teaching ministry and the work of the Council for the Laity we can draw a series of guidelines and enrichments, theological and pastoral, for our family and social lives and for the feminine presence in the Church and in the Franciscan Family.

Return